Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burcher vs Lake Cowal.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lake Cowal edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lake Cowal (952) sits above Burcher (915). Lake Cowal skews owner-occupied (71%), Burcher runs more rental-dense (41% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lake Cowal edges out on average school ICSEA (952 vs 915).

Common questionsBurcher vs Lake Cowal

Common questions

Does Burcher or Lake Cowal have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lake Cowal scores 952 vs 915 in Burcher. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burcher
Metric
Lake Cowal

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$225/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$225/wk
$110/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$265/wk
41.0%
Owner occupied
71.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
82
Population
43
46
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
3
915
Avg ICSEA
952

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).