Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burekup vs Roelands.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Roelands edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Roelands (997) sits above Burekup (989). Roelands skews owner-occupied (90%), Burekup runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Roelands edges out on average school ICSEA (997 vs 989).

Common questionsBurekup vs Roelands

Common questions

Does Burekup or Roelands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Roelands scores 997 vs 989 in Burekup. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burekup
Metric
Roelands

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$298/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$298/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$320/wk
79.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
788
Population
938
38
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
3
989
Avg ICSEA
997

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).