Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burnett Creek vs Croftby.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Croftby edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Croftby (979) sits above Burnett Creek (935). Burnett Creek skews owner-occupied (140%), Croftby runs more rental-dense (81% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Croftby edges out on average school ICSEA (979 vs 935).

Common questionsBurnett Creek vs Croftby

Common questions

Does Burnett Creek or Croftby have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Croftby scores 979 vs 935 in Burnett Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burnett Creek
Metric
Croftby

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$291/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$291/wk
$247/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
140.0%
Owner occupied
81.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
16
Population
129
59
Median age
53

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
6
935
Avg ICSEA
979

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).