Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burnie vs Montello.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Montello skews owner-occupied (60%), Burnie runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Montello has a heavier family-household mix (63% vs 46%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

The numbers behind the take

Burnie
Metric
Montello

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$240/wk
$240/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$240/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
60.0%
51.0%
Renter occupied
37.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
100
0
Transit score
0
60
Bike score
65
693
Population
1,241
42
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
13
941
Avg ICSEA
941

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).