Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burnt Bridge vs Greenhills.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Greenhills edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Greenhills (863) sits above Burnt Bridge (861).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Greenhills edges out on average school ICSEA (863 vs 861).

Common questionsBurnt Bridge vs Greenhills

Common questions

Does Burnt Bridge or Greenhills have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Greenhills scores 863 vs 861 in Burnt Bridge. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burnt Bridge
Metric
Greenhills

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$178/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$251/wk
39.0%
Owner occupied
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
30
Bike score
30
110
Population
23,166
30
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
12
861
Avg ICSEA
863

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).