Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burnt Yards vs Tallwood.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Tallwood edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Tallwood (958) sits above Burnt Yards (922). Tallwood skews owner-occupied (96%), Burnt Yards runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Tallwood edges out on average school ICSEA (958 vs 922).

Common questionsBurnt Yards vs Tallwood

Common questions

Does Burnt Yards or Tallwood have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Tallwood scores 958 vs 922 in Burnt Yards. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burnt Yards
Metric
Tallwood

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$240/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$125/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$200/wk
63.0%
Owner occupied
96.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
39
Population
67
36
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
7
922
Avg ICSEA
958

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).