Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burrapine vs Millbank.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Burrapine edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Burrapine (933) sits above Millbank (874). Burrapine skews owner-occupied (100%), Millbank runs more rental-dense (70% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Burrapine edges out on average school ICSEA (933 vs 874).

Common questionsBurrapine vs Millbank

Common questions

Does Burrapine or Millbank have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Burrapine scores 933 vs 874 in Millbank. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Burrapine
Metric
Millbank

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$250/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
58
Population
113
52
Median age
59

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
933
Avg ICSEA
874

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).