Side by sideSuburb comparison

Burtville vs Laverton.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Laverton edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Laverton scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 4/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsBurtville vs Laverton

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Burtville or Laverton?

Laverton scores 4/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Burtville
Metric
Laverton

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$80/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$80/wk
$68/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$95/wk
Owner occupied
27.0%
Renter occupied
52.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
4
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,333
Population
907
37
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

1
Schools nearby
1
738
Avg ICSEA
738

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

Compare Burtville against another suburb

Or compare any two suburbs nationally →