Side by sideSuburb comparison

Calavos vs Coonarr.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coonarr edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coonarr (963) sits above Calavos (945). Coonarr skews owner-occupied (82%), Calavos runs more rental-dense (65% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coonarr edges out on average school ICSEA (963 vs 945). Coonarr also has a higher family-household share (77% vs 64%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCalavos vs Coonarr

Common questions

Does Calavos or Coonarr have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coonarr scores 963 vs 945 in Calavos. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Calavos
Metric
Coonarr

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$285/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$285/wk
$128/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
65.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
31.0%
Renter occupied
8.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
359
Population
257
45
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

9
Schools nearby
20
945
Avg ICSEA
963

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).