Side by sideSuburb comparison

Caloola vs Wimbledon.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wimbledon edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wimbledon (975) sits above Caloola (973). Wimbledon skews owner-occupied (70%), Caloola runs more rental-dense (59% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wimbledon edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 973). Wimbledon also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCaloola vs Wimbledon

Common questions

Does Caloola or Wimbledon have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wimbledon scores 975 vs 973 in Caloola. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Caloola
Metric
Wimbledon

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$320/wk
$175/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
70.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
12.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
62
Population
88
42
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
18
973
Avg ICSEA
975

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).