Side by sideSuburb comparison

Camden Park vs Camden South.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Camden Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Camden Park (1016) sits above Camden South (1015). Camden Park skews owner-occupied (93%), Camden South runs more rental-dense (82% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Camden Park edges out on average school ICSEA (1016 vs 1015). Camden Park also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 79%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCamden Park vs Camden South

Common questions

Does Camden Park or Camden South have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Camden Park scores 1016 vs 1015 in Camden South. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Camden Park
Metric
Camden South

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$500/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$500/wk
$420/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
93.0%
Owner occupied
82.0%
6.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
45
Bike score
100
2,233
Population
4,595
39
Median age
38

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1016
Avg ICSEA
1015

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).