Side by sideSuburb comparison

Campbell vs City.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Campbell edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Campbell (1139) sits above City (1136). Campbell skews owner-occupied (60%), City runs more rental-dense (36% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Campbell edges out on average school ICSEA (1139 vs 1136). Campbell also has a higher family-household share (64% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCampbell vs City

Common questions

Does Campbell or City have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Campbell scores 1139 vs 1136 in City. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Campbell
Metric
City

Price & Market

$1,715,000
Median house
$649,500
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$490/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$550/wk
$500/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$550/wk
60.0%
Owner occupied
36.0%
38.0%
Renter occupied
62.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

100
Walk score
100
100
Transit score
100
100
Bike score
100
6,564
Population
4,835
28
Median age
27

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1139
Avg ICSEA
1136

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).