Side by sideSuburb comparison

Canning Mills vs Bickley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Bickley edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Bickley (1037) sits above Canning Mills (1017).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Bickley edges out on average school ICSEA (1037 vs 1017). Canning Mills also has a higher family-household share (175% vs 87%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCanning Mills vs Bickley

Common questions

Does Canning Mills or Bickley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Bickley scores 1037 vs 1017 in Canning Mills. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Canning Mills
Metric
Bickley

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$360/wk
$200/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$350/wk
100.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
15
Bike score
100
26
Population
713
15
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
20
1017
Avg ICSEA
1037

Climate

777 mm
Annual rainfall
777 mm
31.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).