Canunda vs Port Macdonnell

Port Macdonnell scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 14/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Port Macdonnell skews owner-occupied (78%), Canunda runs more rental-dense (60% owner).

Buying in Canunda or Port Macdonnell?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Canunda? The free selling guide

Canunda and Port Macdonnell side by side

MeasureCanundaPort Macdonnell
Renting
House rent–$500/wk
Unit rent–$220/wk
Owner occupied60.0%78.0%
Renter occupied80.0%16.0%
Schools
Schools nearby1717
Average ICSEA958958
Lifestyle and people
Walk score014
Transit score00
Bike score040
Population21859
Median age2853
Climate
Annual rainfall720 mm716 mm
Mean max, January24.4°C23.7°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Canunda has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 69%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Canunda vs Port Macdonnell: common questions

Which is more walkable, Canunda or Port Macdonnell?

Port Macdonnell scores 14/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.