Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cartmeticup vs Lime Lake.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lime Lake edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lime Lake (934) sits above Cartmeticup (931). Cartmeticup skews owner-occupied (74%), Lime Lake runs more rental-dense (43% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lime Lake edges out on average school ICSEA (934 vs 931). Cartmeticup also has a higher family-household share (105% vs 43%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCartmeticup vs Lime Lake

Common questions

Does Cartmeticup or Lime Lake have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lime Lake scores 934 vs 931 in Cartmeticup. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cartmeticup
Metric
Lime Lake

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$150/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$180/wk
$150/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$153/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
43.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
16
40
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
2
931
Avg ICSEA
934

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).