Side by sideSuburb comparison

Catalina vs Denhams Beach.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $695,000 and $900,000. Catalina edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Catalina (median $695,000) is roughly 23% cheaper to buy into than Denhams Beach ($900,000). Over the past year, Catalina (+3%) ran 3.0 percentage points ahead of Denhams Beach (0%) on house-price growth.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Catalina is the lower entry point at $695,000 median, 23% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Catalina carries both higher gross yield (4.49% vs 3.47%) and stronger 12-month growth. On the headline numbers, it's the cleaner investor case of the two.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsCatalina vs Denhams Beach

Common questions

Is Catalina or Denhams Beach cheaper to buy in?

Catalina has the lower median house price at $695,000, roughly 23% below Denhams Beach ($900,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Catalina or Denhams Beach?

Over the past 12 months, Catalina grew +3% vs 0% in Denhams Beach, a gap of 3.0 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Catalina or Denhams Beach?

Gross rental yield on houses is 4.49% in Catalina vs 3.47% in Denhams Beach. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Catalina
Metric
Denhams Beach

Price & Market

$695,000
Median house
$900,000
$245,520
Median unit
$245,520
+3.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$600/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$600/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$450/wk
70.0%
Owner occupied
68.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
70
Bike score
45
2,522
Population
650
53
Median age
61

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
5
902
Avg ICSEA
902

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).