Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cecil Hills vs Green Valley.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,451,000 and $1,150,000.

Green Valley (median $1,150,000) is roughly 26% cheaper to buy into than Cecil Hills ($1,451,000). Over the past year, Cecil Hills (+9.9%) ran 0.9 percentage points ahead of Green Valley (+9%) on house-price growth.

Green Valley scores higher on walkability (2/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cecil Hills (984) sits above Green Valley (957). Cecil Hills skews owner-occupied (83%), Green Valley runs more rental-dense (69% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Green Valley is the lower entry point at $1,150,000 median, 26% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Investors face a yield-versus-growth split: Green Valley delivers the better gross yield (2.94% vs 2.92%), but Cecil Hills has run faster on capital growth this year. The right pick depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow or capital appreciation.

For families

Cecil Hills edges out on average school ICSEA (984 vs 957).

Common questionsCecil Hills vs Green Valley

Common questions

Is Cecil Hills or Green Valley cheaper to buy in?

Green Valley has the lower median house price at $1,150,000, roughly 26% below Cecil Hills ($1,451,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Which has stronger property growth, Cecil Hills or Green Valley?

Over the past 12 months, Cecil Hills grew +9.9% vs +9% in Green Valley, a gap of 0.9 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.

Does Cecil Hills or Green Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cecil Hills scores 984 vs 957 in Green Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Cecil Hills or Green Valley?

Green Valley scores 8/100 on walkability vs 2/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

Which suburb has higher rental yield, Cecil Hills or Green Valley?

Gross rental yield on houses is 2.94% in Green Valley vs 2.92% in Cecil Hills. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.

The numbers behind the take

Cecil Hills
Metric
Green Valley

Price & Market

$1,451,000
Median house
$1,150,000
$377,280
Median unit
$755,000
+9.9%
Annual growth (house)
+9.0%
Days on market

Rental

$815/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$650/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
83.0%
Owner occupied
69.0%
14.0%
Renter occupied
28.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
6,906
Population
12,919
38
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
984
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).