Side by sideSuburb comparison

Central Macdonald vs Webbs Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Central Macdonald edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Central Macdonald (972) sits above Webbs Creek (966). Webbs Creek skews owner-occupied (90%), Central Macdonald runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Central Macdonald edges out on average school ICSEA (972 vs 966). Central Macdonald also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 45%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCentral Macdonald vs Webbs Creek

Common questions

Does Central Macdonald or Webbs Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Central Macdonald scores 972 vs 966 in Webbs Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Central Macdonald
Metric
Webbs Creek

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$251/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
90.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
49
Population
55
51
Median age
58

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

4
Schools nearby
5
972
Avg ICSEA
966

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).