Side by sideSuburb comparison

Central Queensland Mc vs Oasis Gardens.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Oasis Gardens edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Oasis Gardens scores higher on walkability (28/100 vs 52/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household.

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

School and household data is too similar between the two to call a winner on family fit. Check the individual profiles for street-level school catchments.

Common questionsCentral Queensland Mc vs Oasis Gardens

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Central Queensland Mc or Oasis Gardens?

Oasis Gardens scores 52/100 on walkability vs 28/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Central Queensland Mc
Metric
Oasis Gardens

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$281/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$230/wk
Owner occupied
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

28
Walk score
52
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
29,819
Population
43,828
37
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
946
Avg ICSEA
946

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).