Chapman vs Waramanga.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,317,500 and $930,000. Waramanga edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Waramanga (median $930,000) is roughly 42% cheaper to buy into than Chapman ($1,317,500).
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Waramanga (1106) sits above Chapman (1093). Chapman skews owner-occupied (88%), Waramanga runs more rental-dense (70% owner).
For buyers
Waramanga is the lower entry point at $930,000 median, 42% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.
For investors
Waramanga offers the higher gross rental yield (2.12% vs 1.78%), favouring cash-flow investors.
For families
Waramanga edges out on average school ICSEA (1106 vs 1093). Chapman also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 69%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.
Common questions
Is Chapman or Waramanga cheaper to buy in?
Waramanga has the lower median house price at $930,000, roughly 42% below Chapman ($1,317,500). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.
Does Chapman or Waramanga have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Waramanga scores 1106 vs 1093 in Chapman. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which suburb has higher rental yield, Chapman or Waramanga?
Gross rental yield on houses is 2.12% in Waramanga vs 1.78% in Chapman. Gross yield equals annual rent divided by purchase price. Net yield (after strata, rates, insurance, agent fees and maintenance) typically runs 1.5-2 percentage points lower.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Chapman against another suburb