Chelmsford vs Wheatlands

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chelmsford (854) sits above Wheatlands (851). Chelmsford skews owner-occupied (78%), Wheatlands runs more rental-dense (64% owner).

Buying in Chelmsford or Wheatlands?

The free buying guide: what you can really spend, the schemes and stamp duty in your state, inspecting, and making the offer.
Get the free buying guide

Selling in Chelmsford? The free selling guide

Chelmsford and Wheatlands side by side

MeasureChelmsfordWheatlands
Renting
Owner occupied78.0%64.0%
Renter occupied27.0%11.0%
Schools
Schools nearby411
Average ICSEA854851
Lifestyle and people
Walk score00
Transit score00
Bike score00
Population10082
Median age5449
Climate
Annual rainfall666 mm639 mm
Mean max, January31.4°C31.9°C

Green dot: better on that measure (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk). Each suburb’s profile gives the source and period of its figures.

Which suits whom

For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Chelmsford edges out on average school ICSEA (854 vs 851). Chelmsford also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 68%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Chelmsford vs Wheatlands: common questions

Does Chelmsford or Wheatlands have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chelmsford scores 854 vs 851 in Wheatlands. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.