Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,008,500 and $1,575,000. Chelsea Heights edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Chelsea Heights (median $1,008,500) is roughly 36% cheaper to buy into than Patterson Lakes ($1,575,000).

Chelsea Heights scores higher on walkability (12/100 vs 8/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chelsea Heights (1079) sits above Patterson Lakes (1040).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

Chelsea Heights is the lower entry point at $1,008,500 median, 36% below the other suburb. For first home buyers, that translates to a smaller deposit and lower stamp duty bill.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Chelsea Heights edges out on average school ICSEA (1079 vs 1040).

Common questionsChelsea Heights vs Patterson Lakes

Common questions

Is Chelsea Heights or Patterson Lakes cheaper to buy in?

Chelsea Heights has the lower median house price at $1,008,500, roughly 36% below Patterson Lakes ($1,575,000). The gap on units is usually similar but worth checking on the full suburb profiles.

Does Chelsea Heights or Patterson Lakes have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chelsea Heights scores 1079 vs 1040 in Patterson Lakes. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Chelsea Heights or Patterson Lakes?

Chelsea Heights scores 12/100 on walkability vs 8/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Chelsea Heights
Metric
Patterson Lakes

Price & Market

$1,008,500
Median house
$1,575,000
$778,000
Median unit
$710,000
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

Rent (house / wk)
Rent (unit / wk)
84.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

12
Walk score
8
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
100
5,393
Population
7,793
40
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1079
Avg ICSEA
1040

Climate

639 mm
Annual rainfall
639 mm
25.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
25.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).