Side by sideSuburb comparison

Chiltern vs Chiltern Valley.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Chiltern edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Chiltern (992) sits above Chiltern Valley (990).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Chiltern edges out on average school ICSEA (992 vs 990). Chiltern Valley also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 66%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsChiltern vs Chiltern Valley

Common questions

Does Chiltern or Chiltern Valley have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Chiltern scores 992 vs 990 in Chiltern Valley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Chiltern
Metric
Chiltern Valley

Price & Market

$660,000
Median house
$205,920
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$260/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$140/wk
85.0%
Owner occupied
91.0%
11.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
1,580
Population
77
50
Median age
52

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
9
992
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).