Side by sideSuburb comparison

Claremont Meadows vs Werrington.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Claremont Meadows edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Claremont Meadows (977) sits above Werrington (963). Claremont Meadows skews owner-occupied (77%), Werrington runs more rental-dense (52% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Claremont Meadows edges out on average school ICSEA (977 vs 963). Claremont Meadows also has a higher family-household share (86% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsClaremont Meadows vs Werrington

Common questions

Does Claremont Meadows or Werrington have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Claremont Meadows scores 977 vs 963 in Werrington. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Claremont Meadows
Metric
Werrington

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$400/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$400/wk
$430/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$360/wk
77.0%
Owner occupied
52.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
46.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

2
Walk score
0
Transit score
100
Bike score
5,177
Population
5,328
33
Median age
32

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
977
Avg ICSEA
963

Climate

1302 mm
Annual rainfall
1302 mm
26.0°C
Mean max (Jan)
26.0°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).