Side by sideSuburb comparison

Clifden vs Southgate.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Clifden edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clifden (934) sits above Southgate (917).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Clifden edges out on average school ICSEA (934 vs 917). Clifden also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 70%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsClifden vs Southgate

Common questions

Does Clifden or Southgate have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clifden scores 934 vs 917 in Southgate. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Clifden
Metric
Southgate

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$300/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$300/wk
Owner occupied
72.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
27
Population
198
35
Median age
51

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

11
Schools nearby
16
934
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).