Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cliftleigh vs Louth Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Louth Park edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Louth Park (995) sits above Cliftleigh (980). Louth Park skews owner-occupied (95%), Cliftleigh runs more rental-dense (52% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Louth Park edges out on average school ICSEA (995 vs 980). Louth Park also has a higher family-household share (94% vs 82%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCliftleigh vs Louth Park

Common questions

Does Cliftleigh or Louth Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Louth Park scores 995 vs 980 in Cliftleigh. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cliftleigh
Metric
Louth Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$427/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$373/wk
$435/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$400/wk
52.0%
Owner occupied
95.0%
46.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
5
Bike score
85
2,309
Population
922
27
Median age
35

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
980
Avg ICSEA
995

Climate

1143 mm
Annual rainfall
1143 mm
24.7°C
Mean max (Jan)
24.7°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).