Clyde vs Auburn South.
Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.
Auburn South scores higher on walkability (40/100 vs 100/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Clyde (1017) sits above Auburn South (1009).
For buyers
We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.
For investors
Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.
For families
Clyde edges out on average school ICSEA (1017 vs 1009).
Common questions
Does Clyde or Auburn South have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Clyde scores 1017 vs 1009 in Auburn South. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
Which is more walkable, Clyde or Auburn South?
Auburn South scores 100/100 on walkability vs 40/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Clyde against another suburb