Coal Point vs Fishing Point.
Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $1,150,000 and $1,150,000. Fishing Point edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.
Coal Point and Fishing Point have near-identical medians ($1,150,000 vs $1,150,000). Over the past year, Fishing Point (+11.7%) ran 23.6 percentage points ahead of Coal Point (-11.9%) on house-price growth.
On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Fishing Point (989) sits above Coal Point (986).
For buyers
The two suburbs land at similar price points ($1,150,000 vs $1,150,000), so the buying decision usually comes down to lifestyle fit rather than affordability.
For investors
Fishing Point has run faster on 12-month capital growth, favouring growth-led investors.
For families
Fishing Point edges out on average school ICSEA (989 vs 986).
Common questions
Which has stronger property growth, Coal Point or Fishing Point?
Over the past 12 months, Fishing Point grew +11.7% vs -11.9% in Coal Point, a gap of 23.6 percentage points. Twelve-month growth can swing year to year, so weight long-run trends from the individual suburb profiles before making a buy decision.
Does Coal Point or Fishing Point have better schools?
On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Fishing Point scores 989 vs 986 in Coal Point. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.
The numbers behind the take
Price & Market
Rental
Lifestyle & Demographics
Risk & Hazard
Schools
Climate
Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).
Compare Coal Point against another suburb