Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coalcliff vs Stanwell Park.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coalcliff edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coalcliff (1090) sits above Stanwell Park (1081). Coalcliff skews owner-occupied (89%), Stanwell Park runs more rental-dense (79% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coalcliff edges out on average school ICSEA (1090 vs 1081).

Common questionsCoalcliff vs Stanwell Park

Common questions

Does Coalcliff or Stanwell Park have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coalcliff scores 1090 vs 1081 in Stanwell Park. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coalcliff
Metric
Stanwell Park

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$530/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$530/wk
$640/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$460/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
79.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
17.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
10
Transit score
70
Bike score
212
Population
1,532
47
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
8
1090
Avg ICSEA
1081

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).