Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cobaki Lakes vs Bilambil Heights.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cobaki Lakes edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cobaki Lakes (1001) sits above Bilambil Heights (990). Bilambil Heights skews owner-occupied (83%), Cobaki Lakes runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cobaki Lakes edges out on average school ICSEA (1001 vs 990). Bilambil Heights also has a higher family-household share (75% vs 39%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCobaki Lakes vs Bilambil Heights

Common questions

Does Cobaki Lakes or Bilambil Heights have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cobaki Lakes scores 1001 vs 990 in Bilambil Heights. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cobaki Lakes
Metric
Bilambil Heights

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$420/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$420/wk
$400/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$470/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
83.0%
Renter occupied
16.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
Transit score
20
Bike score
42
Population
3,491
48
Median age
44

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
1001
Avg ICSEA
990

Climate

1304 mm
Annual rainfall
1304 mm
28.9°C
Mean max (Jan)
28.9°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).