Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coles Creek vs Traveston.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Traveston edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Traveston (1013) sits above Coles Creek (997). Traveston skews owner-occupied (88%), Coles Creek runs more rental-dense (48% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Traveston edges out on average school ICSEA (1013 vs 997). Coles Creek also has a higher family-household share (91% vs 81%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsColes Creek vs Traveston

Common questions

Does Coles Creek or Traveston have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Traveston scores 1013 vs 997 in Coles Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coles Creek
Metric
Traveston

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$340/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$325/wk
48.0%
Owner occupied
88.0%
22.0%
Renter occupied
6.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
Transit score
Bike score
68
Population
509
42
Median age
50

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
4
997
Avg ICSEA
1013

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).