Side by sideSuburb comparison

Collie vs Shotts.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Collie scores higher on walkability (22/100 vs 0/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Shotts (957) sits above Collie (925).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Shotts edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 925).

Common questionsCollie vs Shotts

Common questions

Does Collie or Shotts have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Shotts scores 957 vs 925 in Collie. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Collie or Shotts?

Collie scores 22/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Collie
Metric
Shotts

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$250/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$213/wk
75.0%
Owner occupied
21.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

22
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
100
Bike score
5
7,599
Population
9
43
Median age
48

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
3
925
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).