Side by sideSuburb comparison

Colo vs Neville.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

Neville scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 6/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Colo (955) sits above Neville (954).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Colo edges out on average school ICSEA (955 vs 954).

Common questionsColo vs Neville

Common questions

Does Colo or Neville have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Colo scores 955 vs 954 in Neville. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

Which is more walkable, Colo or Neville?

Neville scores 6/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Colo
Metric
Neville

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$320/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$272/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$278/wk
Owner occupied
95.0%
Renter occupied
9.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
6
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
45,077
Population
229
39
Median age
42

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

10
Schools nearby
13
955
Avg ICSEA
954

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).