Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cona Creek vs Nandowrie.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Nandowrie edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Nandowrie (1055) sits above Cona Creek (991). Nandowrie skews owner-occupied (100%), Cona Creek runs more rental-dense (44% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Nandowrie edges out on average school ICSEA (1055 vs 991). Nandowrie also has a higher family-household share (78% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCona Creek vs Nandowrie

Common questions

Does Cona Creek or Nandowrie have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Nandowrie scores 1055 vs 991 in Cona Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cona Creek
Metric
Nandowrie

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$200/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$170/wk
44.0%
Owner occupied
100.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
57
Population
31
34
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
1
991
Avg ICSEA
1055

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).