Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coochin Creek vs Pelican Waters.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coochin Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coochin Creek (1061) sits above Pelican Waters (1043). Pelican Waters skews owner-occupied (86%), Coochin Creek runs more rental-dense (52% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coochin Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (1061 vs 1043). Pelican Waters also has a higher family-household share (85% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCoochin Creek vs Pelican Waters

Common questions

Does Coochin Creek or Pelican Waters have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coochin Creek scores 1061 vs 1043 in Pelican Waters. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coochin Creek
Metric
Pelican Waters

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$390/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$1075/wk
$395/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$540/wk
52.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
19.0%
Renter occupied
13.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
100
76
Population
7,393
41
Median age
55

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
16
1061
Avg ICSEA
1043

Climate

1068 mm
Annual rainfall
1068 mm
30.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
30.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).