Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cooks Myalls vs Parkes.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Parkes edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Parkes scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 36/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Cooks Myalls skews owner-occupied (78%), Parkes runs more rental-dense (66% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cooks Myalls has a heavier family-household mix (83% vs 67%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsCooks Myalls vs Parkes

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Cooks Myalls or Parkes?

Parkes scores 36/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Cooks Myalls
Metric
Parkes

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$260/wk
$170/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$260/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
66.0%
Renter occupied
29.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
36
0
Transit score
10
0
Bike score
75
49
Population
11,324
43
Median age
39

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

6
Schools nearby
6
939
Avg ICSEA
939

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).