Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coomboona vs Gillieston.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coomboona edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coomboona (957) sits above Gillieston (937). Coomboona skews owner-occupied (71%), Gillieston runs more rental-dense (55% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coomboona edges out on average school ICSEA (957 vs 937). Gillieston also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 60%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCoomboona vs Gillieston

Common questions

Does Coomboona or Gillieston have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coomboona scores 957 vs 937 in Gillieston. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coomboona
Metric
Gillieston

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$245/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$210/wk
71.0%
Owner occupied
55.0%
21.0%
Renter occupied
15.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
134
Population
45
43
Median age
49

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
957
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

422 mm
Annual rainfall
422 mm
29.8°C
Mean max (Jan)
29.8°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).