Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coopernook vs Lansdowne Forest.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Lansdowne Forest edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Lansdowne Forest (912) sits above Coopernook (905).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Lansdowne Forest edges out on average school ICSEA (912 vs 905). Coopernook also has a higher family-household share (70% vs 31%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCoopernook vs Lansdowne Forest

Common questions

Does Coopernook or Lansdowne Forest have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Lansdowne Forest scores 912 vs 905 in Coopernook. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coopernook
Metric
Lansdowne Forest

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$305/wk
$305/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$100/wk
84.0%
Owner occupied
13.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
625
Population
23
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

5
Schools nearby
18
905
Avg ICSEA
912

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).