Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coorumba vs Stoters Hill.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Coorumba edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coorumba (896) sits above Stoters Hill (891). Stoters Hill skews owner-occupied (86%), Coorumba runs more rental-dense (72% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coorumba edges out on average school ICSEA (896 vs 891).

Common questionsCoorumba vs Stoters Hill

Common questions

Does Coorumba or Stoters Hill have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coorumba scores 896 vs 891 in Stoters Hill. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coorumba
Metric
Stoters Hill

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$250/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$250/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$220/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
86.0%
23.0%
Renter occupied
19.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
137
Population
97
41
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

15
Schools nearby
11
896
Avg ICSEA
891

Climate

2065 mm
Annual rainfall
2065 mm
31.5°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.5°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).