Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coraki vs Ruthven.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Ruthven edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Ruthven (945) sits above Coraki (931).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Ruthven edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 931). Ruthven also has a higher family-household share (100% vs 67%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCoraki vs Ruthven

Common questions

Does Coraki or Ruthven have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Ruthven scores 945 vs 931 in Coraki. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coraki
Metric
Ruthven

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$300/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$310/wk
$300/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$313/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
76.0%
17.0%
Renter occupied
10.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

8
Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
1,373
Population
114
46
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

20
Schools nearby
20
931
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).