Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coutts Crossing vs Kangaroo Creek.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Coutts Crossing (925) sits above Kangaroo Creek (917). Kangaroo Creek skews owner-occupied (93%), Coutts Crossing runs more rental-dense (83% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coutts Crossing edges out on average school ICSEA (925 vs 917).

Common questionsCoutts Crossing vs Kangaroo Creek

Common questions

Does Coutts Crossing or Kangaroo Creek have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Coutts Crossing scores 925 vs 917 in Kangaroo Creek. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Coutts Crossing
Metric
Kangaroo Creek

Price & Market

$571,000
Median house
$205,920
Median unit
-4.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$520/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$520/wk
$415/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$415/wk
83.0%
Owner occupied
93.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
23.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,053
Population
102
44
Median age
56

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
20
925
Avg ICSEA
917

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).