Side by sideSuburb comparison

Coxs Crown vs Rylstone.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Rylstone edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Rylstone scores higher on walkability (0/100 vs 72/100 ), useful if you're optimising for a car-light household. Coxs Crown skews owner-occupied (125%), Rylstone runs more rental-dense (75% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Coxs Crown has a heavier family-household mix (100% vs 62%), which typically signals stronger demand for family-amenable infrastructure (parks, schools, supermarkets).

Common questionsCoxs Crown vs Rylstone

Common questions

Which is more walkable, Coxs Crown or Rylstone?

Rylstone scores 72/100 on walkability vs 0/100. Above 70 is considered very walkable (most errands on foot), 50-69 is walkable for some errands, below 50 typically requires a car for daily life.

The numbers behind the take

Coxs Crown
Metric
Rylstone

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$270/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$270/wk
$230/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
125.0%
Owner occupied
75.0%
Renter occupied
18.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
72
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
18
Population
904
46
Median age
54

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
3
909
Avg ICSEA
909

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).