Side by sideSuburb comparison

Cranbrook vs Wansbrough.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Wansbrough edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Wansbrough (940) sits above Cranbrook (932). Cranbrook skews owner-occupied (59%), Wansbrough runs more rental-dense (36% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Wansbrough edges out on average school ICSEA (940 vs 932). Wansbrough also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 65%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCranbrook vs Wansbrough

Common questions

Does Cranbrook or Wansbrough have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Wansbrough scores 940 vs 932 in Cranbrook. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Cranbrook
Metric
Wansbrough

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$174/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$164/wk
$174/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$139/wk
59.0%
Owner occupied
36.0%
30.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
505
Population
60
44
Median age
34

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

3
Schools nearby
5
932
Avg ICSEA
940

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).