Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crayfish Creek vs Port Latta.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Crayfish Creek edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Crayfish Creek (920) sits above Port Latta (918).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Crayfish Creek edges out on average school ICSEA (920 vs 918).

Common questionsCrayfish Creek vs Port Latta

Common questions

Does Crayfish Creek or Port Latta have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Crayfish Creek scores 920 vs 918 in Port Latta. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crayfish Creek
Metric
Port Latta

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$230/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$230/wk
$185/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$196/wk
72.0%
Owner occupied
11.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
68
Population
4,968
58
Median age
46

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
11
920
Avg ICSEA
918

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).