Side by sideSuburb comparison

Creewah vs Cathcart.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Cathcart edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Cathcart (945) sits above Creewah (941). Creewah skews owner-occupied (88%), Cathcart runs more rental-dense (71% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Cathcart edges out on average school ICSEA (945 vs 941). Cathcart also has a higher family-household share (74% vs 29%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCreewah vs Cathcart

Common questions

Does Creewah or Cathcart have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Cathcart scores 945 vs 941 in Creewah. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Creewah
Metric
Cathcart

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$260/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$200/wk
$221/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$180/wk
88.0%
Owner occupied
71.0%
Renter occupied
26.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
36
Population
106
59
Median age
37

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

8
Schools nearby
3
941
Avg ICSEA
945

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).