Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crescent Head vs Old Station.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Old Station edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Old Station (905) sits above Crescent Head (888). Crescent Head skews owner-occupied (74%), Old Station runs more rental-dense (50% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Old Station edges out on average school ICSEA (905 vs 888).

Common questionsCrescent Head vs Old Station

Common questions

Does Crescent Head or Old Station have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Old Station scores 905 vs 888 in Crescent Head. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crescent Head
Metric
Old Station

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$295/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$295/wk
$320/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$330/wk
74.0%
Owner occupied
50.0%
24.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
1,633
Population
32
50
Median age
43

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

16
Schools nearby
8
888
Avg ICSEA
905

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).