Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crinum vs Fork Lagoons.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Crinum edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Crinum (954) sits above Fork Lagoons (937). Crinum skews owner-occupied (78%), Fork Lagoons runs more rental-dense (31% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Crinum edges out on average school ICSEA (954 vs 937). Crinum also has a higher family-household share (96% vs 38%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCrinum vs Fork Lagoons

Common questions

Does Crinum or Fork Lagoons have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Crinum scores 954 vs 937 in Fork Lagoons. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crinum
Metric
Fork Lagoons

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$210/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$210/wk
$350/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$175/wk
78.0%
Owner occupied
31.0%
13.0%
Renter occupied
31.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
86
Population
33
39
Median age
28

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

13
Schools nearby
3
954
Avg ICSEA
937

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).