Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crossley vs Killarney.

Comparing two suburbs with median house prices of $334,000 and $334,000. Killarney edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

Crossley and Killarney have near-identical medians ($334,000 vs $334,000).

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Killarney (1015) sits above Crossley (1014).

Crossley
Metric
Killarney

Price & Market

$334,000
Median house
$334,000
$240,480
Median unit
$240,480
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$263/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$263/wk
$265/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$224/wk
89.0%
Owner occupied
6.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

Walk score
0
Transit score
0
Bike score
0
235
Population
1,423
48
Median age
45

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

19
Schools nearby
18
1014
Avg ICSEA
1015

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

The two suburbs land at similar price points ($334,000 vs $334,000), so the buying decision usually comes down to lifestyle fit rather than affordability.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Killarney edges out on average school ICSEA (1015 vs 1014).

Common questionsCrossley vs Killarney

Common questions

Does Crossley or Killarney have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Killarney scores 1015 vs 1014 in Crossley. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.