Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crossman vs Boddington.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Boddington edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Boddington (993) sits above Crossman (982). Crossman skews owner-occupied (95%), Boddington runs more rental-dense (63% owner).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Boddington edges out on average school ICSEA (993 vs 982). Crossman also has a higher family-household share (82% vs 71%), so the catchment community skews family-heavy.

Common questionsCrossman vs Boddington

Common questions

Does Crossman or Boddington have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Boddington scores 993 vs 982 in Crossman. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crossman
Metric
Boddington

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$280/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$280/wk
$302/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$280/wk
95.0%
Owner occupied
63.0%
9.0%
Renter occupied
32.0%

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
153
Population
1,178
50
Median age
40

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

2
Schools nearby
3
982
Avg ICSEA
993

Climate

724 mm
Annual rainfall
724 mm
31.4°C
Mean max (Jan)
31.4°C

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).