Side by sideSuburb comparison

Crowdy Bay vs Logans Crossing.

Suburb-to-suburb comparison across price, growth, lifestyle, schools and risk. Crowdy Bay edges out on more headline metrics in this comparison.

On school quality, the average ICSEA across schools serving Crowdy Bay (975) sits above Logans Crossing (957).

The takeWhich suburb suits which buyer

For buyers

We don't yet have verified suburb-level medians for one or both of these suburbs. Check the individual profiles for the data we do publish, and the methodology page for how we source it.

For investors

Rental or growth data is incomplete for one or both suburbs. Look at the full investor view on each suburb profile for a complete picture.

For families

Crowdy Bay edges out on average school ICSEA (975 vs 957).

Common questionsCrowdy Bay vs Logans Crossing

Common questions

Does Crowdy Bay or Logans Crossing have better schools?

On average school ICSEA (the ACARA index that benchmarks educational advantage), Crowdy Bay scores 975 vs 957 in Logans Crossing. ICSEA is a school-community indicator, not a quality rating, so always check NAPLAN results and catchment boundaries for the specific address you're considering.

The numbers behind the take

Crowdy Bay
Metric
Logans Crossing

Price & Market

Median house
Median unit
+0.0%
Annual growth (house)
+0.0%
Days on market

Rental

$330/wk
Rent (house / wk)
$350/wk
$450/wk
Rent (unit / wk)
$430/wk
Owner occupied
97.0%
Renter occupied

Lifestyle & Demographics

0
Walk score
0
0
Transit score
0
0
Bike score
0
6
Population
162
28
Median age
57

Risk & Hazard

Flood class
Bushfire risk

Schools

7
Schools nearby
4
975
Avg ICSEA
957

Climate

Annual rainfall
Mean max (Jan)

Green dot = better on that metric (lower price, higher growth, higher walkability, lower risk).